Kates Platground Zip Sets

WHY HE COULD DO WITH AZNAR?

For the first time I've seen a real problem in the RFP. In the past two months, I've been raising his voice to Esperanza Aguirre and his balloon, Acebes resign and splendid Zaplana -ministers, managers and members, but too worn out by the "use" - and old glories party who may miss their share of screen, as happens in almost all English parties, but they seemed normal processes in the necessary renewal of a party, enforceable chapters.

The frightened María San Gil of because of a mysterious clause that fails, I revealed the internal bias that exists in the game. Probably because of the intent of the new paper for not keeping aloof with nationalism, and here is one of the discussions focused, in my opinion, more interesting Congress June.

defend tooth and nail the progressive renewal takes place in the PP, if it is true, it could have started renovating the leader but, remember, nobody, absolutely nobody, has cast himself as an alternative candidate.

draw on the classic comparison with Aznar (see nothing but similes): new people, with little or no experience, makeover ideas more archaic. Remember that we are in politics and that the goal of a match as the PP is able to hold and Government of Spain as a final goal. Let no one forget that Aznar, in his first term, which finished clean-English democracy pact with CiU PNV and no one was alarmed at the party. The absolute majority of 2000 is a very special case: an election with the lowest turnout for democracy and against weaker PSOE in its democratic history. Thus

I argue that, without reaching the ridiculous juggler ZP-disillusioned any political ideal and no other means and an end to power itself, so far as to drop their pants literally before one or the other depending on how the wind blows People's Party can and must be seen moderate nationalist parties because it is your destiny if Spain wants to rule, because it is complicated to obtain an absolute majority in the medium term, even with the PSOE misgovernments and outrages.

The strategy, of course, is not the "gold to the north-south tomorrow." It is important to clarify what is the strong party majority and not bow to pressure constantly tribal ambitions without limit. What I find childish is that a mainstay of the PP, a symbol of courage, moderation and determination as San Gil, the "delete" for the simple fact is contemplated come at a time, to talk to nationalists not-yet-know-know-what , in an incoherent attempt to further isolate the party that has two straight losses.

I have no more than ask me again: "Why yes with Aznar could?"