Although for ZP has was, as always, pull a rabbit from a hat, I have to admit that I agree almost entirely with the new proposal-globosonda-occurrence of the government, read, delaying retirement to 67.
To analyze this measure, much as many try it, it is essential to control the intricacies of labor law or macro figures such as age threshold of contribution, rate of recurrent early retirements or pay for full amount. The analysis seems to me much easier if you apply pure logic.
30 years ago, a English gentleman worked from 15 to 65 years. Before 70 years had died. Of course, this life is not to take it as an example: a brutal killing which, thank God, is already part of the past. However, trading (who traded) 50 years to make sure the last 5, gave a huge sound social security system, through which we enjoy today still had a fair pension.
A young man born in Spain in the 80 starts working from the 20-23, if university. Work, if all goes well, until 65, and live on his pension to the ... say, 90 years (probably live longer, we will be in 2070). Spain already have become a country where old 50% of the population is retired and is dedicated to living pension for 25-30 years.
How can reconcile the figures when half the population take 30 years drawing a pension while 30% are working for 40? Sing figures and forecasts are not at all fatalistic. A pure mathematical issue.
The ideal solution would thus seem to lengthen the working life a bit (you can not compare today with 65, 65, 30 years) for the benefit of the insurance contributions and pensions, despite accounting for 5% more active lifestyle.
lengthen 2 years is not only a further 24 months of contribution and strengthening the fund, but is also 24 months less pension to pay (ie pay off work). 4 years win in succession, in favor of the pension system.
However, the sad thing about this is that our government has taken Farandulera as its nth occurrence in this period of drift and free will. A proposal like this should have been put on the table for quite some time, even with the previous government, the right wing. But then who knows what might have happened (I think May 1, 1968 sequel, with barricades, militiamen and members putting the country in arms, calling for the universal right worker and calling the struggle against the oppressive pattern and the banker).
What is also sad that the political class, far from an example, continue with their pensions and salaries for life in municipalities, independent board, Ministries, State Secretariats and aggregates and several directors, and is not willing to lift a finger to fix it because it does not remove bread pan, and pensions are like the old tithes to be paid to the nobility. Perhaps eliminating 90% of the politicians (of their salaries and pensions of luo lifetime, that is), the problem would be solved much earlier and with much less noise. But chance, only for these things is when a political blue agree with other greens, and the latter with some red ... Although
0 comments:
Post a Comment